After #Dieselgate, a smog curtain between East and West?

Air pollution presents the most severe environmental risk to human health. While the Bulgarian EU Presidency designated air quality improvement one of its top environmental priorities, including it on the agenda of the European Environment Ministers’ informal Council meeting earlier this month, urgent action is still needed to address air pollution’s deadly health burden. The latest data shows a serious air quality divide between Eastern and Western Europe, increasing health inequalities – how will the European Commission respond? 



The social and economic health costs of air pollution

Air pollution, and its negative impact on human health travels over long distances, ignoring national borders.  One of its most serious impacts is the increase in the incidence of many chronic diseases, (especially respiratory and cardiovascular diseases and cancer),[1] placing a growing burden on Europe’s health systems. According to WHO, the economic and human costs to Europe’s cities and societies are huge, at over €1tn per year.[i]

The OECD projects that the market costs of air pollution – including reduced productivity, additional health expenditure, crop losses, etc. – will increase to 2% of European GDP by 2060. However, this is estimated to be equivalent to just one tenth of the non-market costs, including those of illness, ecosystem damage and climate change.[2]

Air Pollution is the new divide between East and West

As the latest Air Quality Report from the European Environmental Agency shows, the quality of air we breathe is not the same everywhere in Europe.

One of the reasons for this sharp divide is the increasing rise of imports of exports of second-hand diesel cars to Central and Eastern European countries, as drivers in Western Europe ditch them in response to the rise in city bans, low-emissions zones and health concerns driven by the Dieselgate scandal. As a result, air quality is worsening in Eastern Europe. Western countries are exporting the problem, rather than solving it, and deepening the East-West air quality divide. [3] The already high social and economic costs linked to air pollution will only also deepen the health gap between east and west.

Air pollution on the agenda of Environment Ministers

Environment ministers from EU national governments, the Western Balkans and EFTA partners exchanged views with the European Commission on ambient (outdoor) air quality during their informal meeting hosted by the Bulgarian EU Council Presidency in Sofia on 10 April. “The time has come to reconsider our approaches to solving issues related to air quality, to move from visions and ambitions to real actions and tangible results. Effective action to reduce the impact of air pollution requires profound changes in policies, lifestyle and attitudes”, stated Neno Dimov, Bulgarian Minister of Environment and Water. But how much do these commitments reflect everyday reality?

Environmental Commissioner Karmenu Vella stated afterwards that “In many environmental areas, Europe is a global leader. But when it comes to air quality, we fail many of our own citizens. Some of our air quality standards are weaker than the recommended WHO levels.  That is why more needs to be done and more will be done.”

Commissioner Vella touted the health in all policies approach, asking Ministers to work across borders and across sectors with their transport, agriculture and energy counterparts, particularly on current EU negotiations on clean vehicle and car CO2 standards.

The Commissioner also reiterated his intention to crack down on governments falling short of health protecting air quality standards, after 9 countries’ ministers (the Czech Republic, Germany, Spain, France, Italy, Hungary, Romania, Slovakia and the United Kingdom) were summoned to an emergency Air Quality Ministerial in January“In these cases I will propose to the College to refer the matter to the European Court of Justice.”

While the calls to work cross-sectorally and the threat of legal action against the 9 member states, are welcome, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) already condemned Bulgaria and Poland in 2017 and 2018 respectively for breaching air quality limits, without imposing any fines. Whether this is the first sign of stronger EU action to improve air quality remains to be seen.

[1] European Environment Agency Air Quality in Europe (2017) 
[2] OECD (2016), The economic consequences of outdoor air pollution, OECD publishing, Paris.
[3] Transport and Environment Report | Dirty Diesels Heading East 
[i] World Health Organisation, Economic cost of the health impact of air pollution in Europe, 2015

Get the EPHA Newsletter

Get involved !

Get involved !

Sign up here to receive our updates on European health policy and invitations to our events.

Subscribe now

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Share This